Sweden
Congestion management - Distributed Market Model
1. Description of the Use Case
1.1. Name of the Use Case
| ID | Area /Domain(s)/Zone(s) | Name of the Use Case |
|---|
| 1 | Regional / local, | Sweden |
1.2. Version Management
| Version No. | Date | Name of author(s) | Changes | Approval status |
|---|
| 1 | 2019-07-23T00:00:00 | Vattenfall, | none | approved |
1.3. Scope and Objectives of Use Case
| |
|---|
| Scope | This BUC describes the actions that are carried out in case of congestions in the low voltage as well as medium voltage distribution grid using a peer to peer market. |
| Objective(s) | • Local and regional DSOs want to give customers opportunity to optimize their resources |
| • Local and regional DSOs meets grid needs with a market opportunity | |
| • In addition, the flexibility provider wants to meet financial goals | |
| Related business case(s) | n/a |
1.4. Narrative of Use Case
Short description
mitigate congestion at distribution level
Complete description
The BUC describes the steps that are followed to eliminate congestions in low-voltage and medium-voltage distribution system using flexiility provided by resources connected to both systems.
| ID | Name | Description | Reference to mentioned use case objectives |
|---|
| 23 | Cost of R&I solution VS grid alternative solution | Cost of R&I solution VS grid alternative solution | BUC SE-1b, |
1.6. Use case conditions
| Relation to other use cases |
|---|
|
| Level of depth |
| Prioritisation |
| nice to have |
| Generic, regional or national relation |
| national |
| Nature of the use cases |
| business |
| Further keywords for classification |
| n/a |
2. Diagrams of Use Case
3. Technical Details
3.1. Actors
| Actor Name | Actor Type | Actor Description | Further information specific to this Use Case |
|---|
| DSO | ENTSO-E | None | |
| FPS | None | None | |
3.2. References
| No. | References Type | Reference | Status | Impact on Use Case | Organistaor / Organisation | Link |
|---|
| no reference has been used | none | n/a | n/a | | n/a |
4. Step by Step Analysis of Use Case
4.1. Overview of Scenarios
| No. | Scenario Name | Scenario Description | Primary Actor | Triggering Event | Pre-Condition | Post-Condition |
|---|
| 1 | Long term process | Coordinet platform and functionalities interaction in national energy market | | Long term process | | |
Notes
4.2. Steps – Scenarios
| Scenario Name: |
|---|
| Long term process |
| Step No. | Event. | Name of Process/ Activity | Description of Process/ Activity. | Service | Information Producer (Actor) | Information Receiver (Actor) | Information Exchanged | Requirements, R-ID |
|---|
| 1 | Flexibility needs to be exchanged in the day-ahead | Flexibility bids | Cooridnet receive bids (buy/sell) from FPS through DSOs, | get | FPS | DSO | | |
| 2 | Coordinet settles flexibility | Confirmation of the flexibility bids | Bids settlment by Coordinet platform (first come first serve), that communicates results to FPS | get | | FPS DSO | | |
| 3 | bids accepted | P2P market clearance | P2P market is cleared in a distributed manner by Coordinet platform | create | | FPS DSO | | |
| Information exchanged ID | Name of Information | Description of Information Exchanged | Requirement |
|---|
6. Requirements (optional)
| Category Identifier | Name | Description | mRID |
|---|
| Req_ID | Req_Name | ‘Congestion management - Distributed Market Model’ | |
| Identifier | Name | Description | mRID |
|---|
| n/a | n/a | n/a | n/a |
7. Common Terms and Definitions
| Key | Value | Refers to Section |
|---|